In Book I or his Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Locke argues that we do not have innate
ideas. He is, of course, famous for his theory of the mind that pictured the
mind as a blank slate at birth, as a tabula
rasa. His theory is in contrast with
that of the continental rationalists, who argue that we are born with some
innate knowledge. Early on in the Essay, Locke claims that there are no
innate ideas, and throughout Book I he seeks to dismantle various arguments
favoring innateness. One of the ideas that he considers likely to be innate is
the idea of God. Earlier, Descartes said that the idea of God is imprinted on
the human mind as a sort of craftsman’s stamp. However, when Locke evaluates
the argument using his measure of “children and idiots,” he finds that the idea
of God is not, in fact, innate; it must be taught. The idea of God is not
usually present in the minds of children, and when it is, Locke says the idea
is a far better representation of the idea of the child’s teacher than of the a
God that actually exists.
No comments:
Post a Comment